Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Start Your Pension Sooner Rather than Later

I was reading an article recently based on research from insurer Standard Life. It revealed that  75% of under 45s with a pension are not aware of the total value of their pension pot or the level of income they will receive from it when they stop working.

This followed on from research by HSBC which showed that a worrying one in five Britons anticipate that they will never stop working as a result of not having saved adequately.

The problem is that by not keeping a close eye on our pensions in the earlier years, we run the risk of falling behind and leaving any top ups until the last minute, when it may be too late to catch up.

Alongside our homes, retirement savings are likely to be one of most peoples biggest assets. So by not keeping track of the value of pension pots and how they are performing, I believe many may be missing out on opportunities to take action and really are leaving themselves vulnerable at a later age.

My Own Pension Planning (…or lack of)

I started work in the early 1970s with a small family firm of solicitors. I am sure the individual partners in the firm would have taken care of their own pensions but there was no provision for staff.

Some 8 or 9 years later, I did start a personal pension plan with London Life, but with a young family and mortgage to pay, I could not afford a great deal - maybe £25 per month from memory. I imagine a significant percentage of the monthly contributions would have been eaten up in charges.

In my early 30s, I moved from private practice to a commercial position with an insurance company and the employment package included a decent non contrib. final salary pension. Some 5 years later however, I changed tack completely to become self-employed and start up a new retail business with a few friends. The main focus was to get the new business established, purchase equipment and stock as well as grow the customer base - this left little surplus in the early years of start-up for pensions although we did eventually get a modest plan sorted with the help of an adviser - but once again some high initial charges.

Some ten years on and it was again a change of tack - into financial services and again, a half-decent pension package. This lasted for around 5 years when it was time to move to join a partnership running  personal development centre on the edge of Dartmoor, Devon - a further period of self-employment and only spasmodic lump sum pension contributions.
River Tavy, West Devon
Nr Pew Tor, Dartmoor


At the tender age of 55 yrs, the business was sold, I moved back 'up North' and I have since drifted into ‘retirement’. When I say retirement, I have done some voluntary charity work, moved house 3 times and written my ebooks.

The above, I’m sure you would agree is hardly the text book model of preparation for a comfortable early retirement. Then again, I have enjoyed many challenges in my various career choices and would probably do the same all over again. The thought of working in a corporate legal environment - 9 to 5, suit & tie - for some 30 odd years with the certainty of a great FS pension at the age of 65 yrs leaves me feeling a little numb!

SIPP

In the mid ‘noughties’, I had been investing in shares and investment trusts for many years - initially in a PEP and later in an ISA. I started to compare the returns I was making against my various small pockets of professionally managed pension plans. More often than not, I found that I was able to significantly produce better returns and when I looked into this in a little more detail, I found that many of the pension plans were charging between 2% and 3% each year (at least) on the total value of the pot. To compound the problem, some of the plans had initial units subject to charges of 5% for the first 5 years.

I concluded that these high charges were probably the main reason for the under performance of the plans compared to my own investments.

The solution was simple, take advantage of low cost diy options and so open and manage my own SIPP with Sippdeal (now AJ Bell YouInvest) and arrange for the value of each plan to be transferred. No more pension charges!

Pension Drawdown

Having managed my own pension investments for around 7 years - including the downturn of 2008/09 when my investments were down around 30% at the end of the year - I came to a point where I was ready to take an income. I obtained a couple of quotes for an annuity but the rates offered were not attractive and furthermore I asked myself the question why I would want to hand over my lifetimes savings to an insurance company for such a measly return of around 4%.

The decision to opt for income drawdown was simple - I retain control of the pot, I take a gradually rising income for the rest of my life and pass on the capital - subject to tax - to my children - simples!

In recent months, there has been a significant change in pensions proposed by the chancellor in his March budget. From next April, I will no longer be limited by GAD rates but will be free to take as much or as little as I choose from my pension pot and all money withdrawn will be taxed at marginal rates. As I have very little other taxable income at present, the first £10,500 will not be subject to tax!

During the current year the GAD rate has been increased from 120% to 150% which means I could increase my drawdown around 20%.

Safe Withdrawal Rate (SWR)

OK, I’ve got my pot of money - the question posed is - how much can I safely drawdown each year without the pot becoming depleted - what is a long-term sustainable rate of withdrawal?

The traditional answer based on many academic studies has been 4%. So, with a pension pot of say, £50,000 you should be able to safely withdraw £2,000 p.a.

However, much depends on your preferred asset allocation. The classic AA is 60% equities and 40% bonds/gilts. Over the longer term, equities should provide significantly better returns than bonds, but are more volatile.

For those choosing a safety first portfolio with a higher proportion of gilts, a rate of 4% may be too much. Indeed, in recent articles by both Monevator and RIT, the safe withdrawal rate may be as little as 3% or even less.

My personal choice so far has been 60% equities and 35% PIBS and 5% higher yield bonds. The equities are held via a basket of mainly income focussed investment trusts. My strategy was/is to invest in the sectors of the market offering the best overall long-term sustainable yield - having done that, I then drawdown the income.

The SWR for me therefore is not so much a percentage but more a case of whatever is generated by my investments without resorting to touching capital. Of course, the capital value of my portfolio will rise and fall with the general markets. When the value rises - as it has these past two years - the yield will fall when expressed as a percentage, and when markets fall the yield will rise. What is important is not this percentage but what I hope will be the actual income from the portfolio rising year on year to keep ahead of inflation.

So far, seems to be working - as they say, if it ain’t broke, don’t try to fix it.

State Pension

In addition to any provision for personal pension, I have always believed that I would receive a full state pension at age 65 yrs. From time to time, I have received a forecast of the amount I would likely receive which seemed to be around £5,500 p.a. - this included an element of SERPS/S2P.

The government have recently introduced the new flat rate pension which takes effect from 2016. I will reach state retirement age after this and so should receive the full rate of around £145 per week or £8,000 p.a. less some adjustments for periods when I was contracted out. I am probably one of the lucky ones who will still receive the pension at age 65 - for those not much younger, the starting age will be 66 yrs and for those just starting work today, I imagine they will be lucky to see any state pension before age 70 yrs.

The net effect of combined SIPP drawdown and state pension will, I believe, more than adequately provide for my modest needs. I am not sure however this would be the case if I were to rely just on the state pension alone.

Conclusion

Although I have never been a particularly ‘high earner’ by which I mean higher rate tax payer, and have made several changes in employment direction over the past 40 years or so, I feel the cards have, more by luck than planning, fallen favourably.

If I had known then what I know now, the one thing I would have done differently would be to start some sort of pension far earlier to allow the effect of compound returns an extra decade to work its magic. I think this single aspect could well have resulted in my final pension 'pot' being doubled.

That would be the main advice I would give to young people today starting out in the world of work - start your pension sooner rather than later.

As ever, I would be interested to hear how others have fared with their own plans and what advice they would pass on to others. Leave a comment below.

5 comments:

  1. I presented the case for and against pensions to my stepson.

    Pensions are a product that have the benefit of a tax advantage. You are at the mercy of the fund managers, trustees, and the Government. To many risks in my mind.

Well chosen investments in investment trusts and equities, for which you benefit from an income stream, will probably out perform pensions.

    Regards

    Louis Gunn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Louis, Thanks for leaving a comment.

      I agree that a good selection of investment trusts etc. can provide a decent return an also a rising stream of income when required but this can be achieved via a low cost sipp just as easily as a S&S ISA.

      Whether to save for retirement via a sipp or ISA is perhaps an issue for another time - personally, I would do both.

      Delete
  2. "OK, I’ve got my pot of money - the question posed is - how much can I safely drawdown each year without the pot becoming depleted - what is a long-term sustainable rate of withdrawal?

    The traditional answer based on many academic studies has been 4%. So, with a pension pot of say, £50,000 you should be able to safely withdraw £2,000 p.a."

    I'm not so sure about that. The 4% rule came from the "Trinity" study in 1989 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_study), and then got repeatedly cited and quoted. More recent work (for example, Wade Pfau's) has pretty much blown a hole in the "4% safe-withdrawal rate" belief. It's too high to be safe.

    "My personal choice so far has been 60% equities and 35% PIBS and 5% higher yield bonds ... So far, seems to be working - as they say, if it ain’t broke, don’t try to fix it."

    This portfolio is worrying. There's no capital protection whatsoever. Those PIBs will continue to pay good income until suddenly they don't when the underlying institution hits trouble. By the time you realize that your portfolio had far too much risk in it, you will be unable to fix it, because the losses will be apparent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi,
      Thanks for your comment. The PIBS are with Coventry BS - one of the 'safest' financial institutions in the UK (see previous posts following final results) - so I am not worried at all regarding their capital robustness and ability to continue payments until they are due to be called in 2016.

      Delete
  3. The real worry and risk with pensions is constant Government interference, particularly around the threat to withdraw the tax free lump sum, and the unjust rises in the withdrawal age of private pensions.

    One advantage of SIPPs has been that one could access them well before the state pension age, a threshold which is inexorably rising. However, this is under attack as the Government first raised the access age from 50 to 55 a few years ago, and are now looking at shifting this again to bring it in line with the state pension age.

    If this happens, private pensions will become even more unattractive for younger people as a place to deposit their hard-earned money (let's not forget that almost a quarter of males will never reach the age of 70) unless of course they have generous employer contributions. Louis Gunn's argument is therefore persuasive, that non-pension investments, including ISAs often make much more sense for younger people.

    ReplyDelete